Mania, characterized by intense energy, impulsivity, and mood swings, has long been medicalized and pathologized within psychiatric frameworks. Traditionally treated as a dangerous state requiring strict control through medication, hospitalization, and legal interventions, mania has been viewed as a threat to societal norms.
However, the disability justice movement starts from a different premise: emotional diversity is not a defect to manage but a capacity to support. Depathologizing mania means understanding it as part of the broader human emotional experience rather than a condition requiring suppression. By examining the historical and systemic forces behind the pathologization of mania, we can better understand its role in maintaining control and oppression.
Mania as a Tool for Social Control: Historical and Modern Perspectives
Turning mania into a medical condition serves societal efforts to control behaviors and emotions that deviate from accepted norms. In medieval Europe, individuals exhibiting signs of what we now call mania were confined to asylums or subjected to brutal, inhumane treatments. Bedlam Hospital in London, infamous for its cruel treatment of patients, exemplifies how societies sought to control emotional intensity. People were isolated and mistreated simply for displaying emotions that society deemed abnormal or dangerous.
In the 19th century, as psychiatry evolved into a formalized discipline, its approach to mania remained focused on control rather than care. Psychiatric interventions were disproportionately applied to marginalized groups—women, people of color, and the poor—who were often institutionalized for exhibiting emotional extremes. Women, for example, were frequently diagnosed with hysteria, justifying their confinement and removal from public life. This pattern of pathologizing emotional extremes, particularly among marginalized groups, served as a tool of patriarchal and racial control.
For Black individuals, pathologizing emotional expression served slavery and systemic racism. The diagnosis of "drapetomania" in the 19th century—a pseudoscientific mental disorder that supposedly explained enslaved Africans' desire to escape—illustrates how emotional responses to oppression were pathologized. Psychiatry was used to rationalize and maintain the violent suppression of resistance to slavery, framing emotional expression as madness and justifying brutal interventions.
Thanks for reading Internality: No Externalities! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
As industrial capitalism rose in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, emotional extremes like mania were seen as threats to productivity. Psychiatric institutions flourished as tools to suppress emotional diversity in the name of economic stability. Individuals who did not conform to capitalist norms of discipline and predictability were viewed as liabilities. Thus, mania became a condition to be managed, not understood, reinforcing the idea that emotional extremes were incompatible with societal norms.
The Consequences of Diagnosis: Stripping of Rights and Autonomy
A psychiatric diagnosis of mania has far-reaching consequences beyond medical treatment. Legal mechanisms like involuntary commitment, conservatorships, and guardianships often strip individuals of their autonomy under the guise of protecting public safety. People diagnosed with mania can be forcibly hospitalized, medicated, and placed under guardians' control, removing their ability to make decisions about their healthcare, finances, and personal lives.
Historically, such mechanisms disproportionately affected marginalized groups. The rise of eugenics in the early 20th century led to the forced sterilization of individuals deemed "mentally defective" or "insane," including those with manic diagnoses. The eugenics movement rationalized the removal of reproductive rights from people with psychiatric conditions, framing them as threats to society’s genetic health. Between 1907 and 1937, over 30 states in the U.S. passed sterilization laws targeting individuals with mental health diagnoses, further stripping their autonomy in service of oppressive power structures.
The stigma surrounding mania also often leads to workplace discrimination and social exclusion. Despite legal protections such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), individuals with manic diagnoses are often seen as unreliable or unstable. This marginalizes them from participating fully in society, reinforcing the notion that emotional diversity is a liability rather than a strength.
Why Power Benefits from Pathologizing Mania
The pathologization of mania serves those in power by maintaining social stability and reinforcing capitalist values of productivity and emotional control. Emotional extremes are labeled disruptions to the smooth functioning of society, and psychiatric institutions act as tools to return individuals to a "normal" state aligned with societal expectations. This dynamic marginalizes those who experience mania, perpetuating systems of suppression.
In capitalist societies, individuals experiencing mania are often seen as erratic or unreliable in the workplace, leading to their exclusion from labor markets. This benefits the capitalist system by ensuring that the workforce remains disciplined and manageable. Medicalizing mania reinforces norms of productivity and conformity, silencing individuals whose emotional experiences challenge those norms.
Katie Tastrom, in A People’s Guide to Abolition and Disability Justice, argues that psychiatric institutions function as extensions of carceral systems designed to manage emotional diversity rather than support individuals. This framing serves the interests of those in power by controlling behaviors deemed socially disruptive, particularly among marginalized communities.
Mania, Racism, and the Carceral State
The racialization of mania has had particularly devastating consequences for Black communities. During the Civil Rights Movement, schizophrenia and other psychiatric diagnoses were weaponized against Black activists. Black men were disproportionately diagnosed with psychiatric disorders, their anger at systemic racism cast as paranoia or delusion. This racialized pathologization served to delegitimize Black resistance, silencing activists by framing their emotional responses as signs of mental illness.
Today, this legacy continues as Black individuals are more likely than white individuals to be diagnosed with bipolar disorder and other psychiatric conditions. They are also more likely to be criminalized for behaviors related to mental health crises, disproportionately facing incarceration rather than care. The intersection of racism, psychiatry, and the carceral state shows that psychiatric labels and criminal charges serve the same function: both authorize the state to override a person's judgment about their own state, particularly among marginalized communities.
Disability Justice: Reimagining Mental Health Care
Disability justice offers a framework for rethinking how we approach mania. Rather than viewing emotional extremes as conditions to be controlled, disability justice recognizes emotional diversity as a natural and valuable aspect of the human experience. It advocates for non-coercive, community-based care models that support autonomy and reject the carceral approaches currently dominating mental health care.
Alternatives like the Soteria House movement provide a non-medical, community-based approach to supporting individuals experiencing mania and psychosis. These homes create supportive environments where individuals can navigate their emotional extremes without being subjected to forced hospitalization or medication. Similarly, peer-led crisis response teams have emerged as alternatives to law enforcement intervention during mental health crises, offering empathetic, non-coercive support.
Rethinking Care: Toward Emotional Liberation
Depathologizing mania requires a fundamental rethinking of how mental health care is structured. Disability justice offers a vision of a system that values emotional diversity, autonomy, and community-based care. This approach advocates for non-coercive care models such as peer-led crisis support, holistic therapies, and crisis respite centers. By prioritizing autonomy and rejecting coercion, mental health care can honor the full range of human emotional experiences.
The shift from control to care is essential for emotional liberation. Instead of suppressing emotional intensity, society must support individuals in navigating their emotions with dignity, creativity, and autonomy. This reimagining of care challenges the systems of oppression that have long marginalized those with emotional extremes and opens the door to a more compassionate and inclusive mental health system.
Depathologizing Mania for Justice and Emotional Liberation
The pathologization of mania reflects a long history of societal efforts to control emotional extremes, prioritizing stability and productivity over autonomy and emotional diversity. From medieval asylums to modern psychiatric institutions, mania has been used as a tool of control, disproportionately affecting marginalized groups. Disability justice offers a powerful alternative framework—one that values emotional diversity and emphasizes autonomy, self-determination, and care.
Depathologizing mania is not just about reforming psychiatric care; it is about dismantling the systems of control that have long marginalized individuals with emotional extremes. By embracing alternative care models that prioritize compassion, community, and voluntary support, we can build a mental health system that ensures everyone has the right to emotional liberation. Through this transformation, we can create a society that honors the full spectrum of human emotions, giving people real authority over their own care decisions.