I would be a horrible doctor.

I frankly don't have what it takes to survive today's version of medicine. But who really does?

Reading settings
TL;DR / Summary: I frankly don't have what it takes to survive today's version of medicine. But who really does?

I’ve always admired doctors for their dedication, knowledge, and commitment to doing good in a world that often makes it difficult. Yet when I consider what it truly means to be a doctor today—amid pressures, bureaucracy, and moral compromises—I realize I would make a horrible doctor. Not because I lack intelligence or compassion, but because modern medical practice is riddled with dissonances that would wear me down, break my spirit, and make me question everything I once believed about medicine.

The Ideal vs. The Reality

Most people enter medicine with noble intentions—to heal, to serve, and to make a tangible difference. As they progress through medical school, residency, and practice, they often encounter systemic realities that clash with these ideals. The gap between their desire to help and the constraints of the modern healthcare system is difficult, if not impossible, to bridge.

AI still can't draw stethoscopes
AI still can't draw stethoscopes

I would be a horrible doctor because I couldn’t reconcile these contradictions. Aligning my sense of purpose with a system that prioritizes profits, efficiency, and administrative convenience over patient care would feel like betraying my values every time I made a compromise that placed financial considerations above well‑being.

The Productivity Trap

Modern healthcare is a relentless pursuit of efficiency. Doctors are expected to see more patients in less time, with fewer resources. The typical appointment has shrunk to a tightly scheduled 15‑minute window where every moment is accounted for. This emphasis on productivity often reduces patients to data points, flattening their stories into quick consultations and checklists.

If I were a doctor, fitting compassion into 15‑minute slots would feel unbearable. Rushing from one patient to the next, knowing I couldn’t offer the time or attention they truly deserve, would leave me disconnected from my patients and undermine the reason I chose medicine.

That disconnection leads to burnout, rampant among doctors today. Burnout is the inevitable outcome of a relentless pace and a gap between the calling to heal and the system’s demand for speed. For someone who values empathy, the productivity trap would turn meaningful work into a grind, stripping away joy and fulfillment.

Thanks for reading Internality: No Externalities! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

The Bureaucratic Nightmare

Doctors today complain about the overwhelming amount of bureaucratic work. What should be a profession centered on patient care is dominated by paperwork, electronic health records (EHRs), insurance documentation, and billing codes. These administrative tasks take up an inordinate amount of time, leaving less for patients.

I would be a horrible doctor because the bureaucratic nightmare would suffocate my passion. Filling out forms, navigating insurance policies, and complying with regulations would erode the time I want to spend engaging patients.

Bureaucracy would also make me feel powerless. Even when I knew what was best, I would fight with insurers and administrators, dealing with billing complexities. In a system where the physician’s expertise often takes a backseat to insurers, I would feel alienated from my role as a healer.

The Ethical Dissonance

Being a doctor today means confronting an ethical dissonance between what is right and what is allowed. Pressure to discharge patients early, deny treatments due to insurance limits, or base decisions on financial considerations creates constant strain.

I would be a horrible doctor because I couldn’t accept these compromises. Knowing that financial considerations dictated care would tear at my conscience, and the weight of not always doing what was best for patients would erode my purpose.

This tension is even more pronounced with vulnerable populations—those facing systemic barriers due to socioeconomic status, race, or gender. I would want to advocate fiercely, but the system often pits advocacy against medicine. The helplessness in the face of injustice would deepen my alienation.

The Depersonalization of Care

Modern medicine’s data‑driven focus reduces patients to numbers, metrics, and efficiency targets. This depersonalization is driven by industry pressures that prioritize financial performance over humanity.

I would be a horrible doctor because I couldn’t accept treating patients as data points. I want to build relationships, foster trust, and be present in healing. Yet a system that prioritizes throughput over thoroughness makes this difficult. The commodification of healthcare turns doctors into service providers and patients into consumers, undermining the doctor‑patient relationship.

Depersonalization also affects doctors. Physicians, once trusted healers, are now seen as interchangeable service providers within a marketplace. This shift undermines compassion and contributes to the alienation many physicians feel. I would struggle to reconcile my identity as a doctor with the commodified role the system expects.

The Emotional Toll

In the end, these dissonances—between idealism and reality, bureaucracy and care, ethics and economics—would leave me emotionally drained. Constantly feeling like I wasn’t doing enough or meeting my own standards would break me.

I would be a horrible doctor because I couldn’t bear that dissonance day after day. The weight of knowing the system is broken, and that I can’t fix it alone, would make me feel like a failure—not because of my abilities but because the system is designed to make doctors feel inadequate.

Hope for Change

The truth is, I wouldn’t be a horrible doctor because I lack compassion or skill. I’d be a horrible doctor because the system forces doctors into positions of compromise, dissonance, and emotional exhaustion. The very qualities that should make someone a great doctor—empathy, integrity, and a commitment to patient care—are the qualities that the system erodes over time.

But perhaps this realization is also a call for change. Perhaps the dissonance faced by doctors today is not inevitable but a product of a system that has lost its way. We need to rethink the structures that govern healthcare, prioritizing patient‑centered care over profit‑driven models and empowering doctors to practice medicine in alignment with their values. We need to create a system that supports doctors in their mission to heal, rather than one that alienates them from it.

If that change were to happen—if doctors were given the time, space, and autonomy to truly care for their patients—then maybe I wouldn’t be such a horrible doctor after all. And perhaps we would see a new generation of doctors who, instead of struggling against the system, find themselves empowered by it—able to live up to the ideals that brought them to medicine in the first place.

Imported embed

Continue reading

Related essays

Next routes

Return to the archive, the guide, or a related route to keep the thread moving.

Version history

No prior versions in this archive snapshot.

    Get essays like this by email.

    Get new essays by email

    An occasional note when a new essay goes live.

    Get new essays by email

    An occasional note when a new essay goes live.