It goes without saying that the our collective quest for authentic self-expression has become paradoxicallyperformative. Writers and creators are often ensnared in a cycle of performing a socially acceptable interiority, leading toa profound disconnect from their true selves. This phenomenon, which can be likened to cognitive self-annihilation, involves thegradual erasure of authentic mental landscapes in favor of a constructed, performative self. To reclaim the richness of genuine self-expression, we must navigate the complex interplay between societal norms, personal identity, and the writer's psyche.
The Absurdity of Performed Interiority
Imagine a world where every person's inner monologue sounds like aperfect blend of TED talk inspiration and self-help vulnerability, articulate and insightful, neatly packaged for mass consumption.This absurd ideal pressures writers to contort their natural thought patterns into acceptable shapes, squeezing complex, non-linearexperiences into tidy narrative arcs. The result is a surreal landscape where "authentic" voices sound suspiciously similar, a choirof individuals insisting on their uniqueness while singing in perfect unison.
I Want More Of You In Here: A Guide to Interiority In the Personal Essay and Memoir
A photo of me at the age my students are now, trying to do what they are doing now…
4 months ago · 481 likes ·31 comments · Alexander Chee
This performative pressure extends beyond public expressions to private spaceslike journaling, where societal norms infiltrate even our most intimate thoughts. The internalization of these norms leads to self-censorship, where individuals unconsciously filter their experiences through the lens of what is deemed "acceptable" by dominantcultural standards.
Cognitive Self-Annihilation: The Cost of Conformity
In our relentless pursuit of amarketable inner life, we risk engaging in cognitive self-annihilation—a process that goes beyond mere self-censorship orsocial conformity. This self-erasure operates on multiple levels:
- Cognitive: We train our minds tothink in prescribed patterns, suppressing divergent thoughts and unconventional associations.
- Emotional: We curate our emotional responses, amplifying socially rewarded feelings while suppressing orreinterpreting emotions that don't fit the desired narrative.
- Experiential: We shape our veryexperiences to fit the mold of what we believe will make for compelling content, living our lives as if they were always alreadywritten.
The irony is stark: in our quest to express an "authentic" self, we systematically destroy the veryauthenticity we seek to convey. It's akin to clear-cutting a diverse forest to build a perfectly manicured garden—pleasing butdevoid of natural complexity.
The Collective Flattening of Human Experience
On a societal level,cognitive self-annihilation contributes to a collective flattening of human experience. As individuals conform to standardized modesof interiority, we risk creating a monoculture of the mind, where diverse ways of thinking and being are gradually eliminated. Thishomogenization has profound implications:
- Loss of Cultural Diversity: Unique cultural perspectives onconsciousness and inner life are erased in favor of a globalized, marketable interiority.
- Reduced Problem-Solving Capacity: With fewer diverse cognitive approaches available, our collective ability to tackle complex problems isdiminished.
- Vulnerability to Manipulation: A standardized interiority is more easily influenced andcontrolled, making populations more susceptible to mass manipulation.
Confronting Ableism inWriting
The notion of "writing well" is deeply entangled with ableist assumptions about language, communication, andcognition. Ableism, or the systemic discrimination and prejudice against people with disabilities, permeates our cultural normsaround writing, often marginalizing and devaluing the diverse ways in which neurodiverse individuals express themselves. To fostertrue inclusivity in the literary world, we must confront these ableist biases, embrace neurodiversity, and radically expand ourunderstanding of what constitutes "good" writing.
The Idealized Norm and Its Exclusionary Impact
Atthe heart of ableism lies the concept of the "idealized norm"—a socially constructed set of expectations about how peopleshould think, learn, communicate, and interact with the world. In the realm of writing, this norm manifests as a rigid set of rulesand conventions that prioritize linear structure, emotional transparency, and adherence to standard grammar and syntax.
However, these norms fail to account for the natural diversity of human cognition and expression. Neurodiverse individuals, such
as those with dyslexia, autism, or ADHD, often have distinct cognitive styles that shape their writing process and output. They mayconnect ideas in non-linear ways, focus deeply on specific details, or use language in unconventional but meaningful ways.
Whenthe literary establishment upholds a narrow definition of "good writing" based on neurotypical standards, it excludes and devaluesthese diverse voices. Neurodiverse writers may struggle to conform to arbitrary rules, face barriers to access and inclusion, andhave their work dismissed as "rambling," "clinical," or "unrelatable." This not only limits the range of stories and perspectivesrepresented in literature but also reinforces harmful stereotypes about disability.
Recognizing Ableism in WritingPractices and Spaces
Ableism in writing manifests not only in thestandards we set for "good" writing but also in thepractices and spaces surrounding the act of writing itself. Many neurodiverse individuals face barriers to full participation inliterary communities due to inaccessible events, prohibitive costs, or social stigma.
For example, writing workshops andclasses often emphasize daily writing routines and strict deadlines, which can be exclusionary to those with chronic illnesses ordisabilities who may not be able to adhere to such schedules. Additionally, the use of inaccessible language and terminology canalienate disabled writers, as can the pressure to disclose or explain one's disability to be seen as "authentic" or"inspirational.”
Moreover, technology and writing tools often fail to accommodate the needs of disabled writers. Forinstance, spell checkers and grammar tools are not always optimized for neurodiverse writing styles, and the lack of captioning orsign language in virtual writing events can exclude d/Deaf and hard-of-hearing participants.
Resisting the Pull:Strategies for Reclaiming Authenticity
To resist the tide of cognitive self-annihilation and ableist norms, we mustactively cultivate practices that challenge our assumptions, embrace vulnerability, and expand our creative horizons. Key strategiesinclude:
- Cultivating Cognitive Diversity: Actively seeking out and engaging with diverse ways ofthinking and expressing interiority.
- Practicing Radical Non-Expression: Allowing thoughts andfeelings to exist without the compulsion to articulate or share them, preserving a private inner space.
- Embracing Cognitive Dissonance: Allowing contradictory thoughts and feelings to coexist without trying to resolvethem into a coherent narrative.
- Engaging in "Useless" Thinking: Allowing the mind to wander withoutpurpose, engaging in thought patterns that have no obvious utility or marketable output.
- RediscoveringSilence: Creating space for internal silence, resisting the constant pressure to fill our inner world with content.
Maybe I Should Just Shut Up
In a world that demands constant performance and curationof our inner lives, simply being—without justification, explanation, or performative output—becomes a revolutionary act.By resisting the urge to annihilate our authentic cognitive landscapes, we preserve the rich, complex, and often contradictory natureof human consciousness.
This preservation of cognitive diversity is crucial for the future of human thought and creativity. Inthe uncharted territories of our authentic minds may lie the solutions to our greatest challenges and the seeds of our most profoundart. The path forward is not one of further self-refinement or performance, but of radical acceptance of the mind in all itsmessy, incomprehensible glory.
By embracing the full spectrum of human interiority—including the parts thatdon't fit neatly into social media posts or personal essays—we can hope to resist the tide of cognitive self-annihilation andpreserve the boundless potential of the human mind.