Instrument 13 of 14

The correction ladder

The residual is evidence that tells you which level is failing: the record, the decision, the rule, the burden, the question, or the jurisdiction. Correction that stops below the failing level fixes the case and preserves the source.

Run it on a real case: Robodebt (Australia, 2019), Long COVID coding (United States, 2020–2021)

Which levels are failing?
What depth did the correction actually reach?

Runs on the page. Nothing is sent anywhere; the address bar carries the state.

The failure: A benefits rule denies people whose address changed mid-application. Each denial is appealed and overturned.

Which levels are failing

  • clearThe record — what is held about this person is wrong
  • clearThe decision — the record was right and the decision made from it was wrong
  • indictedThe rule — the decision followed the rule, and the rule is wrong for cases like this
  • clearThe burden — the rule works only because someone else absorbs a cost it never counts
  • clearThe question — the rule answers the wrong question, so a correct answer still fails the person
  • clearThe jurisdiction — the institution is deciding something that was never its to decide

What the correction reached

The residual indicts the rule, but the correction reached the decision. A correction that stops below the failing level fixes this case and preserves the source — the appeal overturns the denial while the rule denies the next one.

The residual is the evidence that tells you which level is failing. The gap between the indicted level and the corrected level is where the institution describes itself as working: case-level relief at rule-level expense. Mark the failing levels and the achieved depth, and the gap states itself.

Where the claim is argued

Next instrument: Incomplete defenses